Thursday, 14 October 2010

Surrender monkeys' fury unabated

The Frenchies really have got their pantaloons in a twist over Eurostar's decision to buy German trains.

This Gallic gem courtesy of Reuters...

"The decision Eurostar took is null and void," French Transport Minister Dominique Bussereau said on LCI television on Thursday.

"Since the beginning we have told the management of Eurotunnel GETH.PA, which manages the tunnel, and Eurostar, which operates it ... that material other than Alstom material cannot be used," Bussereau said.

Hmmm... material other than Alstom material cannot be used?

Liberté, égalité, fraternité - my arse!

UPDATE: @Captain_Deltic notes, via Twitter...

Note that Alstom 'material' in the Reuters quote should be read as 'rolling stock' (materiel roulante).


Old Lady lifts skirts to break record

Telegrammed by our Independent Expert
A First Great Western HST broke speed record from Plymouth yesterday afternoon with record time of 2 hr 43 minutes.

Not bad for a 35-year-old dowager.

FGW will be hoping that Messrs Osborne and Cable have noted in advance of next week's spending review...

UPDATE: This from Captain Deltic...

Not sure that a dowager would strip down to five cars and go like smoke.

Perhaps we should refer to 'train of a certain age'.

Certainly IC125 is more Anne Bancroft than Margaret Rutherford.

Here's to you Mrs Robinson

UPDATE: This from The Skip...

84139 PLYMOUTH 12:50 12:49A 1 EARLY
73000 PADDINGTN 15:31 15:33A 2 LATE


Sadly booked for 2h41, did it in 2h44, saeth TRUST!

UPDATE: This from a Mr Tony Miles...

TRUST is a rounder-up of figures..

I was at the table in front of official timer John Heaton - he is rather more accurate than TRUST!
(and I was wearing a radio controlled watch - as supplied to many TOCs)

By my watch:

Train departed Plymouth at 12:49 & 55 seconds

Came to a halt at Paddington at 15:33 & 18 seconds

So - 2h 43m 23 seconds

TRUST lies - Mr Heaton told FGW "2:43 and a few seconds, I'm just checking the stopwatch" at which point FGW announced "2:43", so TRUST should probably say 2:43.

AND as a couple of bits of rather poor regulation cost 3.5 minutes - according to Mr Heaton - the official time could have been under 2:40 if only those errant signallers had done as well as the rest of their colleagues along the route!

I no longer trust TRUST...

UPDATE: This from a Mr Bruce, who claims he knows what he is talking about...

Why does Mr Miles no longer trust TRUST?

The results are exactly as expected. TRUST works in hh:mm and truncates the seconds.

"Train departed Plymouth at 12:49 & 55 seconds" will be captured by SMART to the second and stored in TRUST as 12:49 - 1m early.

"Came to a halt at Paddington at 15:33 & 18 seconds" will also be captured by SMART to the second and stored in TRUST as 15:33 - 2m late.

Now you may say that we should be working to seconds in TRUST - but aside from the cost of altering the software, what is the point when the contractually timetable is published to the nearest half-minute?


And what does departure mean if you start working to the nearest second? When the doors close? When the wheels turn? When the platform is vacant for its next use?

UPDATE: This from The Sleeper...

Noting Tony Miles comments on TRUST...which is older, an HST or the TRUST system?

UPDATE: This from the aforementioned Mr Bruce...

And in answer to the question, "which is older, an HST or the TRUST system?", it must be the HST because TRUST started its implementation in 1985, if I remember correctly, just a year before I started work on it. This was on the LMR, plugging into the LM's ATR system.

It didn't capture class 2 and 5 units across the entire network until the beginning of Railtrack days and contractual regimes.


And I have a vague recollection that it didn't do automatic data collection on the Western until early Railtrack days when it plugged into various bits of Western signalling.

UPDATE: This further update from Mr Miles...

The point I was making about TRUST is that it is irrelevant when determining a speed record... (especially when it rounds by removing the seconds in the way it does.. according to TRUST the train started moving 55 seconds before it actually did... remind me to pass that really useful information to the organisers of the 2012 Olympics - it will make the race timings so much easier...)

100m - 1 minute
200m - 1 minute
400m - 1 minute
800m - 2 minutes
1500m - 4 minutes

Need I go on?


UPDATE: It would appear so. More from Mr Miles...

And might I just add that
for the purposes of setting a time record it is from the moment the train starts to move until the moment it stops... (As has this thread. Ed)

Transport quangos to be abolished

The government has announced that the following Quangos are to be abolished (with a bowler tip to the Local Democracy Blog):

Department for Transport (DfT):

  • BRB (Residuary) Ltd
  • Commission for Integrated Transport
  • Cycling England
  • Disabled Persons’ Transport Advisory Committee
  • Railway Heritage Committee
  • Renewable Fuels Agency
Whilst the following DfT sponsored quangos will be retained:
  • British Transport Police Authority
  • Civil Aviation Authority
  • Directly Operated Railways Ltd
  • London and Continental Railways Ltd
  • Northern Lighthouse Board
  • Office of Rail Regulation
  • Passenger Focus/Passengers’ Council
  • Traffic Commissioners and Deputies
  • Trinity House Lighthouse Service
One or two surprises in the retained list!

UPDATE: These additional details from The Skip...

BRB (Residuary) Ltd No longer a Public Corporation - Abolish body and transfer functions to the Secretary of State for Transport. BRBR will be wound up once a programme of asset disposals is complete

British Transport Police Authority Retain - Retain on grounds of performing a technical function which should remain independent from Government

Civil Aviation Authority Retain - Retain on grounds of performing a function which requires impartiality

Commission for Integrated Transport No longer an NDPB - Abolish body and seek arrangement that delivers external analysis and strategic advice on cross-modal transport policy and realising benefits, at lower cost

Cycling England No longer an NDPB - Abolish body. We have announced a Local Sustainable Travel Fund and will explore ways of marshalling expert input on cycling issues, including to support the Fund

Disabled Persons' Transport Advisory Committee No longer an NDPB - Abolish body. We are exploring options for continuing to gain the disability advice we need through a more flexible, accountable structure

Directly Operated Railways Ltd Retain - Retain on grounds of performing a technical function which should remain independent of Government

London and Continental Railways Ltd Retain - Retain on grounds of performing a technical function which should remain independent of Government

Northern Lighthouse Board Retain - Retain on grounds of performing a technical function which should remain independent of Government

Office of Rail Regulation Retain - Retain on grounds of performing a function which requires impartiality

Passenger Focus/Passengers' Council Retain and substantially reform - Retain on grounds of performing a function which requires impartiality. Substantially reform to focus on core role of protecting passengers, while reducing cost to taxpayers

Railway Heritage Committee No longer an NDPB - Abolish body and functions. No equivalent protection applies to the heritage items of any other transport sector


So now you know!

UPDATE: This from a Mr West, currently residing in the North American Dominion,...

"Commission for Integrated Transport: No longer an NDPB - Abolish body and seek arrangement that delivers external analysis"

Doesn't that just mean using those over-priced consultants everyone keeps moaning about?

At least it will help boost private sector employment... (full disclosure: I was one of the those consultants before fleeing the country a few years ago).


Hitachi climbs into bed with the Brothers

Hitachi continues to pull out all the stops in a desperate attempt to save the doomed IEP.

Regular readers will recollect that last month the Japanese PM gave Cameron an ear bashing over threats to cancel the white elephant project.

Now Hitachi appears to have climbed into bed with Unite!

This from Politics.co.uk...

A petition, signed by 10000 people, mainly from County Durham will be handed in at 10 Downing Street today (1.00pm, 14 October). The petition calls on the government to endorse Hitachi's bid for the £7.5bn Intercity Express Programme.

Unite regional secretary, Davey Hall who will deliver the petition to Downing street said:

"The people of County Durham know how important this bid is for jobs and the local economy and they're urging the government to support Hitachi's bid. If the government gives the green light to this contract the investment would put the North East back on the map as a significant train manufacturer for the European market. The contract would be a huge boost to the region's economy, generating jobs and supporting Britain's manufacturing base."

Eye wonders if any particular union will be officially recognised at the proposed new facility?

First - where Moore is less

This from Captain James Bigglesworth...

Can nothing stop the relentless rise of one-time Department of Transport smoke and mirrors merchant Paul Moore?

Having returned to his roots at First Group after a controversial spell at Virgin he has once again loosed the surly bonds of earth and returned to the airline industry as comms director of Easyjet.

Ave atque vale and all that