Showing posts with label Piss poor reporting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Piss poor reporting. Show all posts

Wednesday, 24 July 2013

Higgins keeps his word - Shocker!

Much amusement in the industry over today's coverage of David Higgins decision 'to resign'!

Take this, from the usually well informed David Millward in Her Majesty's Daily Telegraph.... 

The decision to resign, which was broken by Sky News, came within days of a fresh row erupting over the bonus package offered to Sir David and four other senior executives at the helm of the company responsible for the country’s train and track infrastructure.

However according to Network Rail, Sir David, 58, has chosen to leave his post to allow his successor to steer through a five year investment package worth more than £35 billion.

“David always made it clear that he didn’t plan to stay on until 2019,” a Network Rail source said. 

Errrr... quite so.

So if Higgins had always made clear that he didn't plan to stay on for CP5 (which he did, even within earshot of the lowly Fact Compiler) then what is the story?

Of course there is a much more interesting tale lurking beneath these lazy headlines: Will the next CEO of Network Rail be an engineer?

Meanwhile, back in the silly season, our next Monarch but two (DV) will be His Majesty King George.

Sire, please could you fix it for Eye to have sloppy journalists' heads lopped off. Ta.

Thursday, 5 May 2011

Mansfield Grauniad lives up to its reputation

Thank God the Grauniad isn't a paper of record!

This from the galley slaves in King's Place (oddly enough also the home of Network Rail)...


"190 moments that made the Guardian"?

Best make that 191!

Saturday, 13 June 2009

Rumble in the bungle

Good news for Scott Wilson.

According to Building magazine:

"Scott Wilson has emerged as the big winner from the latest round of contracts awarded by Crossrail to help design the £16bn London rail scheme."

But what's this?

Can this be the same Scott Wilson that undertook an assessment of noise and vibration prior to the opening of the Stirling-Alloa-Kincardine (SAK) route for Clackmannanshire Council?

An assessment that was subsequently heavily criticised by engineering consultancy Arup, for failing to follow "standard practice".

Hopefully environmental impact assessments won't form part of their new Crossrail work.

UPDATE: This from Dan...

Could that be the same Arup that competes aggressively with Scott Wilson for the same contracts?

The phrase "They would say that, wouldn't they" springs to mind.

Thank you Dan. So Scott Wilson did follow "Standard Practice" then?

Saturday, 25 April 2009

Hull Mail confuses arse and elbow

Exciting news from the East Riding!

The Hull Mail reports on a local lobby group's meeting with My Lord Adonis to discuss "reopening" a railway route:

Minister hears Beverley-to-Hull rail case

Perhaps they could extend the scheme to include Bridlington and Scarborough as well.