This from the Railway Herald...
Eye is unsure whether the Tom Windsor mentioned is the former Rail Regulator or a minor scion of the Royal Family?
Perhaps the soi disant 'veteran' observer would care to clarify?
UPDATE: This from a Mr Brennan Brown...
It is neither as well you know!
And can you please stop referring to me as the "soi disant veteran observer", it's not particularly funny and... (sadly, owing to reasons of space, Eye is unable to publish the rest of this email from the soi disant 'veteran' observer. Ed).
UPDATE: This from Chianothus Virginicus
I hope they have considered Psalm 42 before choosing this name and have amended their maintenance regime accordingly!
"As pants the hart for cooling streams
When heated in the chase..."
Sunday, 24 October 2010
Grand Central new MD - Shocker
Friday, 22 October 2010
IEP undoomed?
This from Guido...
When Philip Hammond tried to sell the cuts package to the people of the north-east on Question Time last night he mentioned a deal with Hitachi to build high speed trains in the area. Jobs were promised...
No doubt Bombardier and Siemens are already consulting M'learned Friends.
UPDATE: This via the WNXX forum...
But not by Hammond !
I just watched Question Time again on BBC iPlayer and Guido is giving the wrong impression.
Hammond was claiming foreign investors liked the North East because of the availability of land and labour.
He said Hitachi promised to build a train factory for the next generation of trains IF they won the contract.
No promises were made by him.
West Yorkshire to get 140mph trains - Official
Exciting news from Yoghurt Rail!
It would appear that the putative Open Access Operator, Alliance Rail, has already stolen a march on Sir Roy McNulty.
Whilst the 'reality based' community is busy working out how joint ventures between NR and TOC's might work Mr Yeowart and his Arriva backed team have apparently solved the problem.
According to the Bradford Telegraph and Argus:
A rail operator has revealed plans to introduce new 140mph inter-city services between Bradford and London and major cities in the north.
Upgrades in CP5? Pah!
Forget NR, let's give the whole network to Yoghurt Rail!
East Coast driven to distraction
This from Our Man in the Black Mac...
In the days of the North Eastern, LNER, BR, InterCity, GNER and NXEC there was always a tradition that, no matter what your rank, you acknowledged the man at the front.
So what are we to make of today's behaviour at York?
Rail Barbie and load five (lawyers?) strolled onto platform 3 to catch the 15:35 to London.
As the train glided in neither the Chairman of East Coast, nor any of her acolytes, could be bothered to salute the driver.
Hopefully when Rail Barbie reaches Town she'll make up for such rudeness by slipping Driv' the customary 10 bob note?
Thursday, 21 October 2010
Trainy speakibold - Victoria liine
This from Tingly Nell...
From the Victoria line...
“This service is being delayed because of signalling and control problems”
Prof Unwin suggests: “Coburgly happy sleepytime, wakey quicksnap! Not knowy which buttonholey pushy, all tubey trundle stop. Deep woe.”
'Elf 'n' Safety front ends
This from the Commander...
In regard to the view of the glossy pic adorning RailTalk in this month’s edition of Captain Deltic’s flagship publication showing LUL’s new ‘S’ stock’ red front end, is there a difference I’ve missed in the requirements for National Rail and LUL?
One notices the Overground ELL units with their yellow front ends, and one remembers the SNCF having to adorn their beautiful casse-nez BB 22000s with yellow protuberances in case they ventured into the daylight at Folkestone.
Again, on mixed LUL/NR infrastructure areas, according to LUL Track Awareness, on receiving a warning from a train driver staff should move to a place of safety and then acknowledge, where as the NR PTS requires an acknowledgement before moving to a place of safety, or you’ll fail the exam.
Likewise, do Chiltern units sound the distinctive LUL warning notes on their horns according to their direction of travel where the lines merge north of Harrow?
Sorry to sound a discordant note - perhaps I would be better employed celebrating today's 205th Anniversary of the Battle of Trafalgar!
UPDATE: The Fact Compiler observes...
The absence of a yellow front end on the ICE3 set at St Pancras received much comment on Tuesday.
As most modern trains now have front end lamps than can be seen from deep-space is it perhaps time to review this particular Standard?
Trainy Speakibold - CSRballs
Professor Unwin compliments Evoli Rail Systems for this splendid example of CSRballs...
The last par in particular is a delight.
Evolvi Rail Systems comment on rail pricing formula changes announced in the Comprehensive Spending Review:
"The change in the rail formula will in time lead to potentially significant fare increases for business travellers, particularly for 'walk-up' tickets," says Jon Reeve, Trade Relations Director at Evolvi, the online rail booking and fulfilment company specialising in business travel.
"This will likely prompt more companies to consolidate their rail bookings within a managed travel policy compliant purchasing environment - in this way they will be able to optimise available budgets through advance purchase, expense monitoring and seamless P2P processes. Organisations will certainly need to leverage the technical innovation brought to market by tools like Evolvi to assist their procurement of rail travel in order to mitigate as far as possible the future increases."
Sadly even the good Prof couldn't translate this cobblers. Deep woe!
UPDATE: This from Sinoda...
Lovely to see that our old friend Sir Humphrey Applebold is writey press releasey for the Evolvi.
Oh, happy day!
UPDATE: This from Wonky Tom...
I *think* it means something like walk-up tickets will get more expensive, so business passengers will switch to advance tickets. However, these are so complex (unlike the release) that they will have to use our product to get the best deals"
It's either that or something about the pen of my aunt.
TSC summons Hammond to discuss CSR
This from the Transport Select Committee...
The Committee has called the Secretary of State to give oral evidence next month to explain the impact of the Comprehensive Spending Review on transport and how he intends to maintain and improve the UK’s transport infrastructure.
Committee Chair Louise Ellman adds, “The Chancellor’s announcements on the CSR made some positive commitments to a limited number of projects. However, I remain concerned that his statement today failed to disclose where the cuts will fall except to confirm that there are bound to be increases in bus and train fares. The Committee will be seeking fuller disclosure so that the public can understand how they will be affected by the 21% cut in the transport budget.”
The meeting takes place on Wednesday, November 24, 2010 in Committee Room 8, House of Commons, at 15:00
A Frenchie writes...
This from le French Taunter...
While you miserable Anglais were worrying yesterday about how you are going to find the money to keep our farmers and our old age pensioners in Gauloises and Pate de Foie Gras, it may have escaped your attention that we have taken further action to ensure that only our magnifique TGVs will ever be allowed to traverse the Tunnel Sous la Manche......
Vive la interoperabilité, as you deluded railway people say in Roast Boeuf-land.
Postman bites crow
Oh dear.
No love lost between Alan Johnson MP and Crow Bar Bob.
On this morning's Radio 4 Today programme the Shadow Chancellor described the leader of the RMT as coming from 'the planet Zog'.
Evidently Johnson remains to be convinced that there is intelligent life 'out there'.
Villiers vignettes... On fare rises
This from the Daily Telegraph...
The raft of rises were condemned by Theresa Villiers, the Tories' transport spokesman.
"At a time when personal budgets are tight and passengers are crying out for value for money, the Government have sanctioned a fare increase 3 per cent over inflation," she said.
"It is now clear that the Government is trying to price people off the railways as a feeble attempt to deal with overcrowding which has resulted from their complete failure to deliver the new capacity on the railways that they have been promising for almost a decade."
Just fancy that!
Wednesday, 20 October 2010
CSR and Transport for London
Setting our future direction – Outcome of the Comprehensive Spending Review
I am writing to brief you on the outcome of the Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR), which was announced by the Chancellor in Parliament this afternoon, as it affects Transport for London (TfL).
The headlines are that vital investment in London’s transport infrastructure and frontline services have been secured during one of the most turbulent economic times in living memory. Crossrail will go ahead, the Tube will be upgraded and we will be able to maintain our existing bus services.
However, as I said in my previous messages, we are facing a significant cut in our funding due to the steps the Government is taking to reduce the budget deficit.
Our funding settlement
After negotiations, the overall funding provided to us by the Department for Transport (DfT) is to be reduced by £2.17 billion over the four years to 2014/15.
This represents a 21 per cent real terms reduction in our DfT funding in 2014/15 compared with the current year.
This reduction has, in part, been covered by higher than anticipated fare revenue from ridership on the Tube, bus and rail network, which has recovered more strongly than we assumed last year. Our funding also comes from fares, borrowing and other sources such as advertising and commercial partnerships, but the reduction in grant from the DfT still represents a significant eight per cent reduction in our overall budget.
So while the settlement represents a very good outcome for us in protecting all of our top transport priorities, it also means that we must take further action to absorb the impact of this cut.
Implications for TfL
A high level summary of what our new funding position enables us to continue to deliver and how we intend to deal with the funding cut is attached. Given that the settlement has only just been confirmed, we now need to work through the implications for our activities in detail as part of our business planning.
I understand, of course, that you will be concerned about what this means for jobs and the projects you are working on.
All of this needs careful assessment as part of that business planning process and will be influenced by the outcome of Project Horizon, which is taking a root and branch look at how TfL operates and is structured. Our aim remains to complete Horizon by April 2011, including a detailed plan for implementation.
However, it is already clear that we will be doing less in a number of areas as a result of absorbing these cuts and that, in any case, we must deliver efficiencies to protect investment and our frontline services. This means that further reductions in the number of jobs at TfL are likely to predominantly affect management, administrative and support functions while we protect Tube and bus mileage and the quality of our frontline services.
I will, of course, communicate more details as we work through the detailed business plan and as the outcomes of Project Horizon emerge.
The Chief Officers and I are committed to ensuring that staff and trades unions are consulted and change is implemented fairly.
Looking forward
Today's announcements are the culmination of months of hard negotiations and it is good news that we have been able to secure funding for our top transport priorities. We have an enormous programme of delivery ahead of us, and we need to continue to ensure that every penny is well spent and that we deliver value for money for fare and tax payers.
Thank you for all your hard work and commitment.
Peter Hendy
Commissioner
TfL’s funding settlement
Delivering a 21st century transport system
Transport for London (TfL)’s funding settlement means that the Mayor and TfL can continue to deliver our top transport priorities, including:
- The upgrade of the Tube, including major congestion relief schemes at Victoria, Bond Street, Tottenham Court Road, Paddington and Bank, and building Crossrail. Together these will add 30 per cent additional capacity to the transport network, boosting the UK economy and improving the reliability of services. Funding beyond 2014/15 has been guaranteed for Tube upgrades and Crossrail.
- London’s extensive and accessible bus network, of such social and economic importance particularly in outer London, is protected.
- TfL’s commitments for the London 2012 Games will be delivered.
- Barclays Cycle Hire will be extended before the 2012 Games and all 12 Barclays Cycle Superhighways will be delivered by 2015.
- The Western Extension of the Congestion Charging zone will be removed by Christmas.
- The East London Line extension to Clapham Junction will go ahead and will be delivered by the end of 2012.
- Fare increases for 2011 will be maintained at the level announced last year – RPI plus two per cent – while free travel and concessions for Londoners are protected.
We already have a massive programme of savings and efficiencies of over £5bn, but further measures to deliver savings and efficiencies are required. TfL will meet the challenge of this new funding settlement in broad terms as follows:
- Project Horizon will ensure the organisation is as efficient as possible and fit for the challenges of managing and operating London’s transport for the next ten years.
- Following a review undertaken by Crossrail management, over £1bn in savings to Crossrail construction will be delivered. A more efficient construction timetable will mean the Crossrail central section now being completed in 2018 and a phased introduction of the other sections and stations.
- For many months now, London Underground (LU) has been looking to make significant savings as it focuses on the core priorities of a reliable service, the line upgrades and schemes to relieve congestion at major stations. The end of the PPP means LU can look for synergies across the line upgrades to deliver them more efficiently and with less disruption to Londoners, for example, between the planned Piccadilly and Metropolitan, Circle, District and Hammersmith & City line upgrades. Through a combination of these measures and of further paring back cosmetic works at stations and deferral of non-essential civil works, over £300 million will be saved over the period.
- Some areas of expenditure will be reduced, and we will focus on core priorities. TfL must also look at ways of increasing revenue and delivering further efficiencies. The following measures will therefore be introduced, resulting in over £300 million over the period:
- The funding provided to boroughs for small scale projects will be reduced to reflect the new profile of the general grant we receive from the DfT.
- As less funding will be available, some areas such as walking and road safety campaigns and smarter travel initiatives will be scaled back. For those that remain, we will deliver in a more efficient way and will be seeking to partner with other organisations to seek sponsorships and other funding for such initiatives.
- TfL will reduce road maintenance spend and investment on the TfL road network, but seek to preserve the state of good repair of the roads through greater operational efficiency.
- It remains the Mayor’s vision that London is Europe’s leading city for electric vehicles, but we will seek to replace a TfL funding reduction with partnerships and alliances with manufacturers and others.
- Charging for parking on the Transport for London Road Network, currently generally free
- TfL has been working hard to realise savings and efficiencies and, at the same time, the London economy has proved to be remarkably resilient to the economic downturn. Ridership on Tube, rail and bus services has bounced back with much greater strength than was originally assumed. This demonstrates that it is London that is leading the UK back into growth, and this must be harnessed for the benefit of the country as a whole. The combination of these efficiencies, which have already been identified and are being implemented, as well as stronger fare revenue, means that TfL’s Business Plan will be boosted by an additional £800 million over the period.This accounts for well over a third of the reduction in our DfT funding.
- As previously proposed and now consulted upon, the Congestion Charge will also increase to £10, or £9 if paid through Auto Pay, from 4 January 2011. The Mayor will also keep under review the effectiveness of the charge on congestion in central London.
CSR and new trains (or lack there of)
This from the DfT Transport Spending Review Press Notice...
The Government is currently considering revised proposals from Agility trains for the Intercity Express Programme. An announcement will be made in due course.
Because aspects of Thameslink and HLOS rolling stock programmes, as well as projects to electrify the Great Western Mainline, and the rail routes around Manchester and Liverpool, are interdependent with the IEP decision, a full announcement on all these programmes will be made at the same time.
Interesting.
This is the only mention of Thameslink in this document.
Meanwhile HM Treasury's Spending Review document makes no mention of Thameslink at all.
And whilst in DfT's Press Notice there is a vague reference to a project to 'electrify the Great Western Main Line' the Spending Review document refers only to 'supporting investment to improve journey reliability on Great Western Main Line services to Wales'.
So with both Thameslink and the electrification of the GWML in question new rolling stock on either route must seriously be in doubt.
Eye suspects that there are some very worried people in Derby and Tokyo tonight.
UPDATE: This from Our Man at 222 Marylebone Road...
This sounds as though DfT Rail's very own Mr Sisyphus has been awoken and told it's time to start pushing the Rolling Stock Plan back up the hill.
CSR - reading between the lines
Telegrammed by Our International Correspondent
So that was interesting!
£6 billion for “capital maintenance” of LUL?
Capital Maintenance is a very specific term – it means spending to maintain the value of the asset at a steady state. This just means keeping LUL as it is – doing proper running repairs to prevent decay. It isn’t investment in enhancements. It is rather less than Baroness Vadera promised over the first 7 years of the Metrodebt and Tubelines fiasco, and hopefully more deliverable.
On London’s cross-city white-elephant, it is odd that there is no actual number attached to the Treasury's commitment to Crossrail, given that bits of it are already being built.
The Crossrail website, in its helpful FAQ section says DaFT will be paying £5 billion, which seems clear enough. The less helpful press statement about driving down costs, dated 27 September
does not give a revised headline number, and merely says £30 million has been taken out of the cost of the new station at Whitechapel.
So more details please.
Perhaps the most illuminating line in the CSR Spending Review document is: "investment to improve journey reliability on Great Western Main Line services to Wales".
If you type this into the Babelfish translation engine and select 'Weasel to English' it says “Electrification not required, refresh HSTs”
UPDATE: This from @AdamBienkov, via Twitter...
Boris says that Crossrail will be delayed a further year #csr
Chancellor's speech and Transport
Mr Speaker, after our defence requirements are met, the Department for Transport will receive the largest capital settlement.
Over the next four years we will invest over £30 billion in transport projects, more than was invested during the past four years.
£14 billion of that will fund maintenance and investment on our railways.
Direct bus subsidies will be reduced, but statutory concessionary fares will remain.
The cap on regulated rail fares will rise to RPI +3% for the three years from 2012, but that will help this country afford new rolling stock as well and improve passenger conditions.
The Secretary of State will set out how more of the transport money will be allocated next week.
But I want to tell the House today about some of the projects that will go ahead.
For let’s remember that even after these tough spending settlements the country is still going to be spending over £700 billion a year.
So in Yorkshire and Humber, capacity on the M62 will be expanded, £90 million will be spent to improve rail platforms across various towns and cities and we will also improve line speeds across the Pennines.
In the North East, £500 million will be spent refurbishing the Tyne & Wear metro and Tees Valley bus network.
In the North West, we will invest in rail electrification between Manchester, Liverpool, Preston and Blackpool and we will provide funding for a new suspension bridge over the Mersey at Runcorn.
Rail and roads are devolved to the Scottish executive, as are roads in Wales – but I can tell the House that major rail investments around Cardiff, Barry and Newport will go ahead.
In the East Midlands the M1 and A46 will be improved.
In the West Midlands, we will extend the Midland Metro and completely redevelop Birmingham New Street station.
In the South West, we will fund improvements on the M5 and M4, and the new transport scheme for Weymouth.
In the East of England, colleagues will be delighted to know that the A11 to Norwich will be upgraded.
Around London, we will widen the M25 between ten different junctions and complete the improvement to the A3 at Hindhead.
And in London, on top of the Olympics, a major investment in our capital city’s transport infrastructure will take place.
Crossrail will go ahead and key Tube lines will be upgraded for the twenty first century.
This is nothing like the complete list.
So yes, we are saving money and putting the state on a more sustainable footing, but even then we will still be spending tens of billions of pounds on Britain’s future infrastructure.
Next week we will also set out our national infrastructure plan – so that private money is also put to work in building for this country the economic infrastructure our businesses need.
Comprehensive spending review and Transport
This from the just published HM Treasury Spending Review document
The Spending Review:
- protects high value transport maintenance and investment, including over £10 billion over the Spending Review period on road, regional and local transport schemes, including construction of the Mersey Gateway bridge; £14 billion for Network Rail, including major improvements to the East and West Coast Main Lines; £6 billion for upgrades and capital maintenance on the London Underground network; and funding to enable Crossrail to go ahead;
1.32 High quality transport links are essential to underpin a successful economy. In 2014-15, transport capital investment will be higher in real terms than 2005-06 levels.
1.33 The Spending Review prioritises capital spending on transport projects which can offer high economic returns when compared to investment projects in other sectors. By focusing on projects that deliver greater benefits in return for their costs, the positive impact of capital spending on the wider economy can be maximised:
- over £10 billion will be invested over the Spending Review period on maintenance and investment in new high value road, regional and local transport schemes, while seeking significant cost reductions across the programme. This includes:
- widening the remaining section of the A11 to provide a continuous dual carriageway link between Norwich and the M11;
- improving the junction between the M4 and M5;
- easing congestion on the M1 between junctions 28 and 31;
- extending the route and increasing capacity on the Midland Metro;
- constructing a new suspension bridge over the River Mersey; and
- upgrades to the Tyne and Wear Metro.
- over £14 billion will be provided for Network Rail, supporting maintenance and investment to continue to enhance the capacity and speed of services across the country. In addition, the Government is supporting investment to improve journey reliability on Great Western Main Line services to Wales; and
- funding will be made available to enable Crossrail to go ahead, providing an additional 10 per cent capacity to London’s rail network, while continuing to seek efficiency savings to maximise value for money from the scheme. In addition, £6 billion will be spent on upgrades and capital maintenance on the London Underground network, supporting growth by improving reliability and reducing journey times.
Supporting long term growth
2.18 Investments of high economic value are protected across all types of transport. The capital allocation has been relatively protected; in 2014-15 DfT capital investment will be higher in real terms than in 2005-06. This includes over £10 billion over the Spending Review period for maintenance and investment in key road and local transport schemes, including widening the remaining section of the A11 to provide a continuous dual carriageway link between Norwich and the M11, improving the junction between the M4 and M5, easing congestion on the M1 between junctions 28 and 31, route extension and capacity increases on the Midland Metro, upgrades to the Tyne and Wear Metro and constructing a new suspension bridge over the River Mersey (the Mersey Gateway) while seeking significant cost reductions across the programme.
2.19 The settlement also includes £14 billion of funding over the Spending Review period to Network Rail to support maintenance and investment, including major improvements to the East Coast Mainline, station upgrades at Birmingham New Street and network improvements in Yorkshire, around Manchester and the Barry to Cardiff corridor. Funding is also confirmed for Network Rail to invest in delivering faster journey times in the North West. In addition, the Government is supporting investment to improve journey reliability on Great Western Main Line services to Wales. Final decisions will be made by DfT after the Spending Review on the replacement of the UK’s inter-city high speed trains.
2.20 Funding will be made available to enable Crossrail to go ahead, providing an additional 10 per cent capacity to London’s rail network while continuing to seek efficiency savings to maximise value for money. £6 billion over the Spending Review period will be spent on maintaining and upgrading the London Underground network, supporting growth by improving reliability and reducing travel times.
2.21 The Government is proceeding with its plans to deliver a new high speed rail network, and will bring forward legislation during this Parliament to allow construction to proceed.
2.22 Key projects that support the Government’s climate change commitment are also protected. This includes an incentive scheme offering up to £5,000 towards the cost of a new ultra-low emission vehicle from January 2011 and supporting electric car charging infrastructure.
2.23 The Government’s intention is to proceed with PFI projects which will deliver sustained improvements in highways maintenance in Sheffield, Hounslow and the Isle of Wight and extend the Nottingham tram network with two new lines. As resources are tight, the Government needs to ensure that every pound is spent to the maximum benefit. The Government will therefore be urgently working with the four local authorities to establish how these projects can be delivered affordably, in order to deliver the much needed benefits.
The Devil is, of course, in the detail which should emerge next week.
DB announces the Exodus Express!
How very appropriate that DB invited a Railway Padre to its 'unveiling' event at St Pancras yesterday.
Eye wonders whether DB made a point of mentioning that the ICE set originated from the home of both Charlemagne and Benedict XVIth?
If so is canny DB planning to target disaffected Anglican's keen to 'Row across the Tiber' with discounted group fares to Rome?
Tuesday, 19 October 2010
Trainy speakibold: SWT
The late Prof Unwin particularly compliments SWT on this piece of railway speak:
"Delays due to power supply problem at Vauxhall."
Translation: 'Trainy got on firibold. Naughty 'leccy.'
ICE arrives at St Pancras
This video via YouTube of today's arrival of an ICE3 at St Pancras.
Either the train suffered a catastrophic derailment or the photographer had a long night.
UPDATE: This from Steve Strong...
Can't DB's press office make a better video available?
ICE test train causes panic in Lobby
News from the Lobby...
After a discussion on the Strategic Defence and Security Review the following exchange took place at this morning's lobby briefing with the Downing Street spokesman:
Transport minister Theresa Villiers is meeting an intercity train from Frankfurt at St Pancras, said the prime ministers spokesman.
"Don't ask me why - before you ask" he added.
A correspondent said it was to publicise the Germans' intention to run a high speed train from Berlin into the centre of London.
"Does the Defence Secretary know about this? " asked another...