Oh dear.
It would appear that DafT's running dogs have been instructed to savage all those expressing views at variance with the wisdom that emanates from Marsham Street.
Amidst the news of scarecrows, flower gardens and coffee mornings this rather caustic comment appears in the October edition of ACoRP's Train on Line:
In the same issue [of New Transit] Richard Malins opines from his planet, wherever it is, that the benefits of gating are mythical...
The piece continues...
There’s a particularly interesting article by Adrian Wheatley [in Railway Strategies] on what stations should offer (including ‘live’ rather than recorded announcements and restricting access to non-travellers – are you reading this Mr Malins?)
Perhaps a little strong?
No matter.
Good to know that ACoRP has added revenue protection modelling to its current skillset of weeding, dusting and hanging bunting.
UPDATE: This from a Mr Malins of that Ilk!
Perhaps you could illustrate the news in your organ that I am being savaged by the DfT's running dogs with this picture, which was used to demonstrate the alleged benefits of ticket barriers in said letter to "Transit", and comes to us courtesy of Passenger Focus.
That letter went on to point out that these benefits are to be brought to East Coast passengers at King's Cross, a scheme piloted by Rail Barbie (self confessed no less) and, she tells me, to be installed on Platforms 0 - 5 by February 2011.
Sadly I am not a subscriber to ACoRP so I don't know what I am actually accused of in Train on Line, but I don't imagine, even in DfT's wildest dreams, that many stations they sponsor will get gated.
First strenuously denied that the challenging dimension of the new vehicles would cause overcrowding problems.
Posts
