New Railway Industry Association CEO Darren Caplan is making his mark.
According to both Railnews and Railway Gazette International RIA issued a statement yesterday on the back of the Article 50 activation:
"Brexit presents the industry with both challenges and opportunities’, said Chief Executive Darren Caplan. "The Railway Industry Association will seek to be specifically included in any Brexit agreement negotiated, ensuring UK railways sit alongside automotive and aerospace as one of the Department for Exiting the EU’s top transport sectors.
"Additionally, we will work with the UK government to maintain trade in as frictionless a manner as possible, for example on standards and tariffs; and we will seek to ensure our industry continues to have access to an adequate supply of skilled labour from the UK and around the world, regardless of the outcome of these negotiations."
Although perhaps a shame that you can't yet find it on the news section of the RIA website...
Thursday, 30 March 2017
RIA ups its lobbying game
Wednesday, 29 March 2017
Tuesday, 28 March 2017
Railfreight and Article 50
This from Hildegard of the Vinzgau...
Wednesday, 22 March 2017
HS2 and UCR 2016
Not a good week for HS2.
The Guido Fawkes website is running a number of articles on the project; suggesting that a crisis board meeting is being held today and calling into question the use of 17 PR agencies.
Meanwhile, UK companies looking to supply into the new railway are getting increasingly frustrated by HS2’s apparent insistence on strict adherence to the Utility Contracts Regulations 2016.
The UK rolling stock supply chain, having been burnt by previous government procurement exercises for both Thameslink and the IEP, is calling for UK content to be a contractual requirement for the new HS2 fleet.
HS2 remains adamant that under the EU mandated Utility Contracts Regulations this cannot happen.
If Chris Grayling is serious about securing a post Brexit Bounce for Britain's rail supply chain then a more flexible approach to HS2 procurement, that favours UK suppliers, must be mandated.
Otherwise the project's multi-billion pound spend risks disappearing off-shore.