Railway Garden Competition - Birmingham New St

This from JT19...

Good to see that despite the modernisation works at Birmingham New Street these heritage railway gardens look set to remain.

Thinly capitalised equity profiteers fight back!

This from a Mr Prester John... 

Bring back British Rail?

 Je don't think so!

UPDATE: This from Our International Correspondent...

Are you sure the top one is a genuine BR advert? 

 

The strange proclivities of the bloke in the bottom right hand corner is not the only thing that is the wrong way round - the double arrow is also.

 

I do not recall Central Advertising Services taking the then National Treasure on a Sealink ferry.

 

 

Railway Garden Competition - Worlaby

This from a Mr Verdant...

Never have I seen such a perfect lawn except, possibly, at Wimbledon.

Introducing the new Chief Whip...

This via @HeardinLondon...

The good news about Sir George Young is that he takes his family on the train.

The bad news is #TheAgeOfTheTrain...

Awkward.

Lookalike - Political careers derailed 1830-2012

UPDATE: This from Everyone...

It would appear that the now former Chief Whip, Andrew Mitchell, has saved Gideon's political bacon...

Gideon Gripped!

This from @RachTownsendITV (for non Twitter regulars read from the bottom up)...

That's the SOFA slashed then.

Bare faced cheek from mainland Europe!

This headline from New Europe On-line: EU Update...


"UK’s rail transport interoperability with Europe’s mainland still lacks behind"
 
That's a bit bloody rich!

Coming, as it does, from a continent whose railways insists on deliberately building their trains so they don't fit our bridges, tunnels and platforms!
 
That is all.

Porterbrook - Bringing home the bratwurst!

This from Tommy Atkins...

Exciting news from the nation's favourite ROSCO...

Porterbrook Leasing has signed a contract with LNWR to repaint 72 Class 150/2 vehicles operated by Arriva Trains Wales, valued at £1M

With franchising stalled this is indeed good news for the UK's increasingly beleaguered rolling stock supply chain!

But what's this?

The 150/2s are operated by Arriva Trains Wales - part of Arriva - owned by Deutsche Bahn.

They will be repainted by LNWR - owned by Arriva - part of Deutsche Bahn.

And the job is being funded by Porterbrook - part-owned by Deutsche Bank.

Deutschland über alles indeed!

Railway Garden Competition - Abroad

This from a Mr Door Bell...

Here are a couple of pics of the approach to Lindau HBf on Lake Constance, Germany.

Note the keenness with which our Teutonic colleagues compete, as they endeavour to lay claim to one of the coveted Railway Garden Competition awards. 

Perhaps DB has Arriva spying on the UK's best entries.

FT opines on DfT's brain drain

This from the Eminence Grise...

Perusing your amusing blog I was surprised that this gem from the Pink'un of the 3rd October had escaped your gimlet eye...

"Among admired repositories of institutional knowledge who have left since the government came to power are Mike Mitchell, director-general of railways, who was not replaced, and Jack Paine, formerly procurement director."

It will not surprise you to know that this sentence failed to make it into the print edition, which remains a paper of record.

TSC - A voice crying in the wilderness...

This from a Mr Tony Miles...

I found this Transport Select Committee report from 2009

It makes interesting reading in the light of recent events…

Highlights in the section headed 'Rail franchising—on track?' include:

3. In our 2006 report on passenger rail franchising, we concluded that the franchising system had failed to fulfil its objectives, and that it was nothing short of a "policy muddle". We were concerned that "the drive to extract premiums from some parts of the network will result in further above-inflation fare increases and a deterioration in customer service, investment and innovation". We argued that the Government needed to "conduct a strategic review of the long term needs of rail passengers, and an honest appraisal of the structure best suited to fulfil these needs over the next several decades". We urged the Government to ensure that this review be included in the 2007 Rail White Paper. The Government failed to do so, telling us that the system was "delivering" both good services and value for money.

7. As we said three years ago, the current system of rail franchising is a muddle.

12. As we have noted in the past, the process for awarding franchises along with the relative absence of significant risks for franchise holders tend to fuel very optimisitc bids.

19. The Government has argued that the difficulty of predicting revenue over 15 or 20 years militates against longer franchises,

21. The needs of passengers have not always been properly catered for within rail franchising contracts. The Government must ensure that franchises are more passenger-focused, and that commitments within existing franchise contracts are also enforced.

Clearly all of this was taken on board and informed the West Coast franchising process…

Eye commends this report to Richard Brown and hopes it will help inform his Review?

Raging against the SE twitter feed

This from SouthEastern's twitter feed...

person hit trains through Gillingham Kt & Faversham subject to 45 mins delay & canc #southeastern bit.ly/RBhKM8
— Southeastern (@Se_Railway) October 17, 2012

This is wrong on so many levels.

On the plus side SouthEastern now appears to have real people (or bots) at the end of their twitter feed who respond to customer requests for information.

As exhibited here:

@spacechopper Apologies for any delay that you incurred. We will have a look into this for you.
— Southeastern (@Se_Railway) October 17, 2012

Time to remove or improve the automatic feed?

ATOC and RDG members have their work cut out

This from AE Watson...

I note that the work to be undertaken by RDG on franchising is to be distinct from that done by ATOC.

Looks like lucky old Hurricane Higgins and Planner Plummer will at least have their weekends free...

Railway Garden Competition - Durham

This via @Arctic_Troll...

 
Disgraceful! And not even Advent yet.

RDG publishes initial thoughts on Franchise Review

This from the minutes of the 9th October meeting of the Rail Delivery Group...

Independent review of franchising
 
This item had been placed on the agenda of the meeting at short notice in the light of the events of the previous week. It was felt that RDG should take a lead on this issue and express the industry’s views to both Government and the independent review of franchising
Points made during discussions included:

• It was essential that the franchising process was restarted as soon as possible;
• There were many changes that would be desirable but there needed to be realism about what was achievable and changes must not get in the way of restarting the franchising process;
• RDG should consider what had been said before on the subject but should not be constrained by previously expressed views;
• RDG‘s views on the key principles of franchising should be expressed succinctly;
• Owning groups were still considering the changes they would seek and the input that they would make; and
• RDG should identify where there was common ground between the owning groups.

During further discussion the Group suggested that some of the issues that could be lodged with the independent review could include:

• The cost, complexity and risk associated with bidding;
• The size, length and risks of franchises;
• That a significant proportion of the savings and efficiencies presumed in the Statement of Funds Available and assumed in the Initial Industry Plan were dependent on the rapid reinstatement of the franchising process enabling franchises to work with Network Rail;
• Mechanisms used in other transport industries and other countries including the use of framework agreements should be considered; and
• There was a paramount need for flexibility in franchising.

The Group agreed that the issue should be progressed by the creation of a working group. The working group should:

• Review previous work on franchising;
• Recognise that significant change could delay the restarting of the franchise process;
• Be distinct from work done by ATOC and other groups;
• Produce a straw man for further discussion; and
• Be responsible for producing RDG’s submission to the independent review of franchising.

Whilst this is a helpful starting point there are one or two gaps in the information that the RDG has published in its minutes.

For instance: 

• Who will be on the new Working Group?

• When is it due to report back?

• Will the Working Group's findings be made public? and;

• Will the Industry Forum be invited to comment on the findings of the Working Group before they are submitted to DfT/Richard Brown?

Now that the ORR has given its blessing to formalising the role of the RDG the group needs to become a lot more transparent and be much more proactive in its engagement with the wider industry.

UPDATE: This from Messrs S Ply & Chain...

Whilst much of the focus on the InterCity West Coast fiasco has been on the impact that it will have on bidders the knock on effect within the supply chain appears not to be given voice.

Significant investment in rolling stock usually follows new franchise awards and with so many franchises now on hold there is a real risk of the supply chain stagnating and shrinking in the short term and overheating in the long.

As McNulty made clear these peaks and troughs need levelling out for the good of the whole industry as well as for tax and fare payers.

RDG needs to broaden its reach and engage with members of the Supply Chain to ensure that conversations on the future of franchising are not restricted to a narrow clique of Owner Groups.

Varsity Line's radical rolling stock solution

This from Poppy the Station Cat...

Good to see that the promoters of East West Rail have embraced the Age of Austerity!

Clearly aware of the challenges faced by today's industry those backing the restoration of the old Varsity Line are planning to use cascaded rolling stock, judging by this video.



Fast forward to 3:01 and at 3:24 for a glorious slo-mo of an articulated bogie!

How marvellous to see this splendid British built train finally make it into revenue earning service.

But is Crewe Heritage Centre aware that they may lose their star exhibit?

ORR backs new talking shop.

Exciting news from the Office of Rail Regulation!

The Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) has today announced that it supports the formalisation of the Rail Delivery Group (RDG). This will strengthen the group’s ability to lead change benefitting the whole rail industry, and improve the value for money the sector delivers for passengers, taxpayers, freight customers and funders.

Eye readers may be interested to know that the RDG's stunning contribution to the review of franchising following the InterCity West Coast fiasco has merited the organisation an entry in the latest issue of the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy.

It reads: 'Mostly pointless'.

Richard Brown Review - Remit published

This from the Department for Transport...

Text of letter from the Secretary of State to Richard Brown
 
15 Oct 2012
 
Following my decision to cancel the competition for the InterCity West Coast franchise, I am asking you to lead an independent Review into the Department’s wider rail franchising programme.
 
I would like your Review to look in detail at the implications for the remainder of the rail franchising programme, in particular, whether changes are needed to the way risk is assessed and to the bidding and evaluation processes, and at how to get the other franchise competitions back on track as soon as possible
 
Terms of Reference of the Review are enclosed.
 
Decisions on how to run the Review and who to involve in it are for you as leader of the Review. You may want to draw on independent advice from outside the Department.
 
I ask that you report your findings to me by the end of December 2012.
 
In addition, an independent Inquiry, into the lessons learned from InterCity West Coast, is being undertaken by Centrica Chief Executive Sam Laidlaw. I have asked Sam Laidlaw to provide initial findings before the end of October.
 
Terms of Reference: Brown Review of the Rail Franchising Programme
 
1. The review should consider the implications for the remainder of the rail franchising programme of the position reached on the InterCity West Coast competition.
 
2.This review should take careful account of the points and lessons learned identified in the Laidlaw Inquiry and should also consider:

• How to structure risk transfer between the Department and rail franchisees in order to create optimum incentives in the long-term interests of passengers and taxpayers, and the ability to adapt to changing circumstances.
• How to structure the bidding and evaluation processes to ensure a robust and fair competition, including evaluation of the risk presented by different bids as a basis for decisions that take these risks appropriately into account.
• The timing of the remainder of the franchising programme, so that it can be resumed on a robust basis as soon as possible.
• How the Department can take the learning points from the Laidlaw Inquiry and facilitate a clear and proportionate framework for franchising which balances Government's administrative and commercial judgements with the need for the market to have predictability, transparency and a proportionate application of legal rules.

3. The review should make recommendations on the basis of its findings.
 
4. The Terms of Reference may be refined further following the publication of the Laidlaw Inquiry. The review shall be completed by 31 December 2012 and published thereafter.
 
5. The review will be led by Richard Brown, Chairman, Eurostar.
 
6. The review team should include external expertise as well as expertise from within Whitehall, and some cross-membership as appropriate with the review of lessons learned.

ENDS

Eye prefers Sir Charles Trevelyan's proposed remit published on Eye last Friday.

Laidlaw Inquiry - Remit published

This from the Department for Transport...

Text of letter from the Secretary of State to Sam Laidlaw
 
15 Oct 2012
 
Following my decision to cancel the competition for running the InterCity WestCoast franchise, I am asking you to lead an independent Inquiry into the Department’s handling of the competition.

I would like your Inquiry to identify the lessons to be learned for the Department and for you to recommend what measures the Department should implement to ensure the sound running of future competitions. Terms of Reference of the Inquiry are enclosed.
 
Decisions on how to run the Inquiry and who to involve in it are for you as leader of the Inquiry. You may want to draw on independent advice from outside the Department and from other Non-Executive Board Members.
 
I ask that you report your initial findings to me on Friday 26 October and to provide a final report by the end of November.
 
Terms of Reference: Inquiry into the Lessons Learned for DfT from InterCity West Coast (“ICWC”) competition
 
1. The Inquiry shall identify the lessons to be learned from the Department’s handling of the franchising process for ICWC in order to ensure the Department maximises benefits to transport users and value for money for taxpayers in future franchise competitions.
 
2. The Inquiry will comprise an immediate study of the lessons learned following the discovery of significant technical flaws in the way the franchising process for ICWC was conducted which resulted in the cancellation of the ICWC franchising process on 3 October 2012, in particular:
 
a. The course of events in DfT that led to these technical flaws in order to identify what happened and why it happened up to the point that the intention to award the contract was announced on 15 August 2012;
 
b. The roles and responsibilities of different advisory and decision-making parties within DfT and externally in relation to these flaws, including the Board Investment and Commercial Committee, the Contract Awards Committee and the Rail Refranchising Programme Board; how well these committees performed their roles, and what can be learned from this about the appropriate structure for governance and assurance of major contract awards;
 
c. The arrangements for ensuring appropriate review of the technical elements of contract award and appraisal and appropriate quality assurance.
 
3. The Inquiry should make recommendations on the basis of its findings.
 
4. The Inquiry will be led by Sam Laidlaw, DfT’s lead Non-Executive Board Member who also leads on procurement among Government Non-Executives. He will draw on others as he sees fit, including from other Non-Executive Board Members. By agreement, Linklaters and Ernst & Young have been appointed to provide an external perspective to the Inquiry.
 
5. The Inquiry should be completed as soon as possible. Initial findings shall be made available to the Department by 26 October.
 
6. The Inquiry will be taking place in parallel with the Department’s HR investigations. The Laidlaw Inquiry Report will be published no later than end November 2012.

ENDS

DfT - Mind the credibility Gap!

Good to see that the Department for Transport remains at the very top of its game!

Eye understands that late last night Marsham Street was desperate to speak to Tim O'Toole.

So naturally they rang London Underground to try to get hold of him... 

Great Minster House - all change please ladies and gentlemen. All change!