The Pope has clarified his position after it was revealed he had broken the rules on celibacy.
Citing the Crown .v. Scotland he said:
"I fully accept the findings of the Conclave that I made a technical breach of the rules. I apologise for having made this inadvertent error."
The Holy Father continued: "Of course this in not a resigning affair, despite the fact I personally promoted this particular piece of Canon law."
Dear God - How much longer must we put up with this dishonest and disreputable bunch?
UPDATE: This from Steve Strong...
Compare and contrast: £5k versus £120k
Comment would be superfluous.
UPDATE: This from John B...
Don't quite understand Steve Strong's point here.
Scotland employed 1 illegal worker; Coleman employed 12. Both of them did so unknowingly.
£10k is the maximum penalty for that; you get £2.5k off for a first offence (including multiple 'first offences' at the same time) and £2.5k off for admitting fault.
So if Coleman admits fault, he'll be fined £5k per worker like Scotland. If he doesn't, then he'll either be fined nothing or £7.5k per worker, depending on whether he can convince them he's got a defence.
UPDATE: This from a Mr Saltaire...
Am I missing the point, or is everybody else?
As I understand it, the Noble Lady (?!???!?!) was fined because she failed to keep copies of documentation, and was therefore unable to prove that she had seen and checked that documentation.
The point is, had she been able to produce copies of the said documentation, would that not have simply proved that she knew the worker was illegal, since that is apparently what she was?
We all know that the reason the opposition is not making hay on this matter, is probably because half of them are also treading on thin ice themselves in this regard.
R.I.P. honest politics!
UPDATE: This from the Velopodist...
Mr Iliffe is indeed missing the point, as are many others.
Had Lady Scotland photocopied the documents, it seems it would have proved that she was shown fairly convincing fakes.
Reading between the lines of statements issued by those investigating these things, there is an investigation going on into how said fakes got produced and collars will soon be felt.
People are getting upset about it because they want to kick the government and because she's Attorney General - except for the Daily Mail, who just can't stand any prominent left-leaning woman.
The Fact Compiler is getting upset because he is utterly scrupulous in all his dealings with officialdom and could never be reproached for even the slightest technical breach of any rule. It's one of his best-known characteristics.
The Fact Compiler is uncertain whether the Velopodist is extracting the urine?
Posts
